Contested Restitution Hearing Requesting Over $5,000 Results in Restitution Hearing Taken Off Calendar and No Victim Restitution Ordered for Hit and Run Case

Our client was originally charged with a violation of Vehicle Code section 20002(a), “Hit and Run Driving Resulting in Property Damage.” After diligently investigating the charges, we were able to negotiate to no jail time, a reduced period of probation, and a fine for our client.

As a condition of his sentence, our client had stipulated to restitution liability for the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the other party.

At the initial restitution hearing, the victims were requesting over $5,000 in restitution payment for chiropractic treatment they had received to treat their injuries from the collision.

After review of the documents, it was clear that the victims requesting restitution did not actually incur any out-of-pocket expenses and, thus, they were not entitled to the restitution they were requesting.

At the next restitution hearing, we explained and proved our position to the prosecution and they agreed and moved to take the restitution matter off calendar.

Our assistance at the restitution hearing saved our client over $5,000 in claimed loss!

We can help you now! Call now for a free telephonic consultation at 626.577.7700!

DISCLAIMER:

The information in this blog post (“post”) is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from Escovar Law, APC or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this Post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction. The information on this website is a communication and is for informational purposes only. The facts of every case are unique and nothing on this page or on this website should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information on this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship and viewing of this information does not create an attorney-client relationship. The result portrayed in this advertisement was dependent on the facts of this case. Results will differ if based on different facts.

Categories: