My client was originally arrested for D.U.I. in Count 1 with a violation of VC § 23152(a) and Count 2 VC § 23152(b). Our office requested an Administrative Per Se (“APS”) hearing to challenge the validity of the Department of Motor Vehicles license suspension.
According to the police reports in the matter, a San Bernardino Sheriff’s Department deputy received a call regarding a subject behind the wheel of a vehicle with open containers in the car. When the deputy arrived he saw my client asleep in the front driver seat with the engine running and holding an open container. My client admitted to drinking an hour prior to the deputy arriving and admitted to driving to the store to purchase more alcohol. My client performed poorly on the Field Sobriety Tests (“FST”) and agreed to complete a chemical test. According to the chemical breath test results, my client had a B.A.C. of .18/.18.
At the APS hearing, the DMV subpoenaed a criminalist to perform a retrograde extrapolation to determine my client’s approximate B.A.C. at the time of driving. The criminalist was unable to determine my client’s B.A.C. at the estimated time of driving and I argued that the DMV was unable to prove that my client’s B.A.C. was 0.08% or more at the time of driving and they have failed to meet the presumption that his B.A.C. was 0.08% or more.
The DMV found my argument persuasive and the suspension of my client’s driving privilege was set aside.
The information in this blog post (“post”) is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from Escovar & Avila, LLP or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this Post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction. The information on this website is a communication and is for informational purposes only. The facts of every case are unique and nothing on this page or on this website should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information on this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship and viewing of this information does not create an attorney-client relationship. The result portrayed in this advertisement was dependent on the facts of this case. Results will differ if based on different facts.